October 01, 2002
Google's new search algorithm
Google has made a couple of updates in their search algorithms and a lot of people are puzzled, upset, confused or starting to worry about Google's power on the 'net.
In my opinion, Google just keeps improving their searches for users looking for content rather than commerce, like they've always strived to.
They have never made any promises towards webmasters relying on inbound traffic from them, as highligheted in this summary of "GoogleGuy"'s statements on webmasterworld...
Personally, the algorithm update resulted in a few ups and downs for me: I'm down to the 17th "Anders" but currently the 4th Jacobsen (and of course the 1st "Anders Jacobsen" and "andersja"...). I don't blame Google for anything. I continue to offer my content to whoever wants to read it, and I'm always happy when readers that discover my site through Google become regular visitors...
Dave Winer comments on a Brilliant Corners post:
Almost amusing to see how much the tweaks upset people... Guys -- I T ' S N O T P E R S O N A L -- Google just serves users looking for content; all indexing and ranking is automated, sometimes with weird results, but such is life..
When I first read Winer's comment, I almost couldn't believe that he (or anyone) would go into someone else's house (or blog) and start throwing insults. Then I thought about who it was. He really does take everything too personally, and I think his emotions get the better of him at times. Thanks for the pointers, though!
Referrers to this page
a mad tea-party
TrackBack URL for this entry:
: More Geek! (October 17, 2002 07:18 AM)
"Andrew Raff is being equally geeky as Mike! Andrew envisions a future where courts publish their opinions in open format (!). I don't want to burst anyone's bubble -- they're great ideas! But I predict there won't be any critical mass happening on that..."
: Google sued by dodgy Search Engine Optimizer (October 22, 2002 07:55 PM)
"More reactions to Google's new search algorithm: ''Google sued by search optimism company''"
[an error occurred while processing this directive]