Martin Roell has an interesting perspective: Knowledge Management does not exist. Personal Knowledge Management does
You can't manage knowledge. If you are an organisation.
You can manage knowledge. If you are an individual."Knowledge" is something personal and only something personal. Once you make it explicit, it's no longer knowledge: It's information. We can manage information well, we can build fancy databases and label them "Knowledge Management Systems" but they remain Information Management Systems. And information by itself is completely meaningless.
If this Knowledge for the sake of knowledge is in any case is useless.
Posted by: Chris Toon on June 29, 2004 06:07 PMIf this Knowledge for the sake of knowledge is in any case is useless.
Posted by: Chris Toon on June 29, 2004 06:07 PMIf this Knowledge for the sake of knowledge is in any case is useless.
Posted by: Chris Toon on June 29, 2004 06:08 PMIf this Knowledge for the sake of knowledge is in any case is useless.
The unsystematized knowledge is better than the systematized ignorance...
hm... Excuse I did not want to add noise in your comments... Your site showed a mistake and I pressed yet have not seen such result
Posted by: Chris Toon on June 29, 2004 06:18 PMYes Chris the knowledge is necessary only for action, more for anything
And it is completely not important as it is systematized
"You can't manage knowledge. If you are an organisation."
But Virginia Woolf described the Reading Room at the British Museum as an enormous brain.
Posted by: andrew on July 7, 2004 04:20 PMActually Andrew, Virginia Woolf is an artist and can describe the British Museum as a giant baboon's anus if she wants to.
You might like to read "The Nonsense of Knowledge Management": http://informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html
Posted by: BBM on January 3, 2005 07:44 PM|
©
Anders Jacobsen [extrospection.com photography] |